WR 1mpostor (aka number 1 moderator) wrote:Gazman2054 wrote:WR 1mpostor (aka number 1 moderator) wrote:Thought any damage to the rear quarter was deemed there fault
If your entering a roundabout or on a roundabout you are responsable for everybody around you as they are for you apparently and all crashes are deemed 50/50 so i've been told by a guy from an insurance company.
Which i think is a load of bollocks in my eyes.
Looking back i just wish someone had see her hit me and stopped...
I was hit last year on a roudabout, by the rear door, the bloke said at the time it was his fault, but since insurance have been involved he has not responded to any of his own insurance's letters!
Hence our like for like "Bristol&London" who we used because of our non-fault are now taking him/them to court. At no time has anyone stated the above.....Are you sure your insurance are operating in your best interest, or just anything for a easy life for them, less paperwork etc !
The insurance have now handed it to the court as she kept telling them i hit her and she wont change her story even though the insurance have seen the damage she caused the rear quater of our car.
They said if she wont back down theres nothing they can do.
We got a letter from the courts saying they wanted us to go all the way to a court in Leeds and we live in Hull.
So we told them were not going 70miles to leeds and we haven heared from them for about 3 month now even though we keep chaseing them up