Page 1 of 1
Induction Kit or Not??
Posted:
Sun Apr 18, 2010 9:49 pmby swrtno1
My question is whether to fit an induction kit or a pannel filtter instead?
Have read a lot of mixed reviews about both and was just wondering witch I would be better off fitting before getting the 1 re mapped? I have just fitted a full 3 inch system
If I was getting an induction kit I would go for the Roger Clark one
All help is much appreciated guys
Posted:
Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:08 amby WR 1mposter
To get the best out a induction kit, a remap would be needed !
Posted:
Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:33 pmby swrtno1
Is it true that an induction kit will damage the MAF sensor?
The car will be mapped in the next few weeks so just wonted to get as much on the car before getting the re-map work done.
Posted:
Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:35 pmby WR 1mposter
Did'nt have any issues with our MAF with the ind. kit !
Ask your mapper he may be the best one to answer your concerns
Posted:
Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:01 amby dynamix
Panel filter would be better IMO.
Posted:
Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:32 pmby swrtno1
Thanks for the replys guys,
Going to get a panel filter
Posted:
Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:05 pmby huzzy
dynamix wrote:Panel filter would be better IMO.
What's the reason behing this? I always thought an induction kit would be better?
Posted:
Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:27 pmby asperformance
until you get to silly power levels the std airbox actually flows very well and keeps pushing cold air in rather than an induction kit which will normally simply increase the noise and suck hot air
Posted:
Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:32 pmby swrtno1
After speaking with Andy Forrest he feels this is the best way forward for me at the moment.
Also belive that the maf sensor is a bit sensitive
Posted:
Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:58 pmby huzzy
asperformance wrote:until you get to silly power levels the std airbox actually flows very well and keeps pushing cold air in rather than an induction kit which will normally simply increase the noise and suck hot air
Okay thanks mate. I knew there was a simple explanation!