Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:40 pmNot bad for a classic 
I think it is about time you posted the spec and price for an Autotecnica 2.5 conversion!!
I think it is about time you posted the spec and price for an Autotecnica 2.5 conversion!!
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:40 pmPosted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:49 pmi will try and do it over weekend with some up to date pictures.
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:58 amjust thought i'd update you guys on how the engine bay looks now, what do ya think?
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 10:53 amNice one Adam.
I'm very much interested in seeing the divider you have made between the engine and air filter.
I'm very much interested in seeing the divider you have made between the engine and air filter.
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:07 amits only a sheet of stainless steel folded which bolts to the chasis leg.
the intake temp is considerably lower with it fitted and this was mentioned by pat at s/c on the rollers last time.
the intake temp is considerably lower with it fitted and this was mentioned by pat at s/c on the rollers last time.
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 2:35 pmlooks very smart Adam 
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:43 amcheers dan, how you doing with selling your motor?
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:22 amAutotecnica wrote:cheers dan, how you doing with selling your motor?
Lots of interest. A guy is on his way to see it this morning who seems very keen! We'll see what happens.. There is also a member on here who might be interested
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:45 amgood luck then mate, its not the easiest time to sell a car but i'm sure you'll have no probs
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:06 pmLooks very nice Adam
No bling for sake of bling just nice & purposeful, like the black intercooler piping
No bling for sake of bling just nice & purposeful, like the black intercooler piping
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:49 amjust thought i'd send a quick reply that had the map finally tweeked yesterday, not a good choice of day to have the car on the rollers on (scooby world) the hottest day of the year 
water temps were getting very high near the end so i settled with 440 bhp but 509.5 lb/ft torque.
i'll try and post the graphs on here soon.
water temps were getting very high near the end so i settled with 440 bhp but 509.5 lb/ft torque.
i'll try and post the graphs on here soon.
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:55 amNice one Adam... Looking forward to a blast in it very soon.
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:58 amJesus, that thing was a monster when we went out in it at your garage!!
Brutal car!
Brutal car!
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:56 pmeven quicker now john and all the way through the rev range, just need tyres for it now then new clutch! 
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:35 amI guess that means we need another trip to Buxton to find out how the beast of a car has got even better 
... What can i buy from Adam this time that wont break the bank ROFL
... What can i buy from Adam this time that wont break the bank ROFL
Re: Nice or nasty...
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:53 amWR1 Bro wrote:
Your thoughts please.
Shows clearly this guy is more interested in looks than efficiency. Way too cluttered and too many colours. My opinion.