Login    Register

SimTek yeh or na

Ask your technical questions here.

Moderators: WR 1mposter, The Swede, Megaman, danr55, WR1 Bro

  • Author
    Message

SimTek yeh or na

Postby rocko » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:03 pm

Hi all, I thinking of goin for simtek

What are your view's and comments on this .. product

Cheers
User avatar
rocko
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:43 pm

Postby dynamix » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:04 pm

Solaris yeah
Simtek nah

:thumb:
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby rocko » Thu Jan 22, 2009 9:07 pm

dynamix wrote:Solaris yeah
Simtek nah

:thumb:


Can you give some reasons why .. cheers buddy
User avatar
rocko
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:43 pm

Postby dynamix » Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:27 pm

Simtek is great value and will do everything you need but until it has active knock correction it relies on the driver acknowledging a flashing CEL as real det or enough det to stop putting his/her foot down.

At that point what do they do?

What can they do?
...Check with the mapper? maybe
...Put the foot down again to make sure it was really det? (maybe two lots of severe det on a bad fuel would kill the engine)
...switch to the second map but if on the conservative map already

Solaris is more expensive but it means you can just drive the car without having to put up with this issue. It can subsequently be mapped closer to the edge of det as the ecu will bring it back based on real time data... making more power IMO.
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby WR 1mposter » Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:24 pm

dynamix wrote:Simtek is great value and will do everything you need but until it has active knock correction it relies on the driver acknowledging a flashing CEL as real det or enough det to stop putting his/her foot down.

At that point what do they do?

What can they do?
...Check with the mapper? maybe
...Put the foot down again to make sure it was really det? (maybe two lots of severe det on a bad fuel would kill the engine)
...switch to the second map but if on the conservative map already

Solaris is more expensive but it means you can just drive the car without having to put up with this issue. It can subsequently be mapped closer to the edge of det as the ecu will bring it back based on real time data... making more power IMO.


Dunc what is a "flashing cel" ?
2007 BMW M5
2004 Petter Solberg STi
User avatar
WR 1mposter
 
Posts: 14095
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:04 am
Location: Sunny Falmouth

Postby dynamix » Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:29 pm

Check Engine Light.

Simtek uses this to identify when DET is occurring. Det is bad btw ;)

Would you notice this whilst flat out?
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby WR 1mposter » Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:38 pm

dynamix wrote:Check Engine Light.

Simtek uses this to identify when DET is occurring. Det is bad btw ;)

Would you notice this whilst flat out?


Thought that was what you meant !

I get it aswell :evil:
2007 BMW M5
2004 Petter Solberg STi
User avatar
WR 1mposter
 
Posts: 14095
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:04 am
Location: Sunny Falmouth

Postby dynamix » Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:53 am

Not wanting to worry you but it could be:
- bad fuel
- bad mapping
- hot charge temps
- running lean
- mechanical issue

Not really a fit and forget type solution.

Were you not told about the CEL flashing for det when it was done?

What worries me more is the second generation owners of these cars who will be less clued up.
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Re: SimTek yeh or na

Postby rob500 » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:13 am

rocko wrote:Hi all, I thinking of goin for simtek

What are your view's and comments on this .. product

Cheers
what did your tuner say?
rob500
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:10 pm

Postby WR 1mposter » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:44 am

dynamix wrote:Not wanting to worry you but it could be:
- bad fuel
- bad mapping
- hot charge temps
- running lean
- mechanical issue

Not really a fit and forget type solution.

Were you not told about the CEL flashing for det when it was done?

What worries me more is the second generation owners of these cars who will be less clued up.


What worries me more is spending the money I spent for it to be like this. :evil:

Should have gone to specsavers !
2007 BMW M5
2004 Petter Solberg STi
User avatar
WR 1mposter
 
Posts: 14095
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:04 am
Location: Sunny Falmouth

Postby Autotecnica » Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:00 am

I've got the simtek on my car, i've only had the cell light on twice now in the 3 months i've been running it, once due to a mechanical sound from me missing a gear :oops: and the time i couldn't find any 99ron fuel and had to use esso 97 :roll:.
the engine is a ej257 with md321t+ running 1.5 bar.
Buxton Subaru Centre. 01298 27391
Autotecnica
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:28 pm
Location: Buxton

Postby WR1 Bro » Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:05 am

Surely the mappers experience is crucial to this discussion? I would have thought that a bad mapper could result in a blown engine with the most sophisticated ECU?
User avatar
WR1 Bro
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20279
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 8:54 am
Location: If skinny, ugly and Scouse was best, then JohnMc would be a porn star legend.

Postby Martynj » Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:54 am

WR1 Bro wrote:Surely the mappers experience is crucial to this discussion? I would have thought that a bad mapper could result in a blown engine with the most sophisticated ECU?


Good point well made, if the mapper has a vast experience of SimTek ecus you shouldn't have a problem.
As mentioned you always have the option of a fall back map with reduced boost, timing, added fuel or whatever else you need to get you through a bad batch of fuel.
SimTek have always had the option of running closed loop knock control, and could do so very easily.
The problem with knock control on a non adaptive ecu isn't when to remove timing, its when to put it back in.
I would be interested in hearing your views on this Duncan.
Martynj
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:19 am

Postby dynamix » Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:07 pm

Good point Martyn - I made suggestions to Steve a while back on this as to how it could be done in a straightforward way. Not sure whether that is further forward with the vast amount of work the group N stuff is bringing his way though.

A fall back map is a good idea but and it is a big but, a lot of people are using the base map as the std map and having map 2 as the high boost, methanol map. It doesnt leave an option for map 3.

I have no axe to grind on this but am shocked by how many people running Simteks that are not explained as to what they are losing by changing to it from the std very very good ecu that subaru/denso have spent millions developing. I appreciate that it does away with the MAF which can save money on classics and suit a lot of them because the std ecu is non mappable but with the newage ecu, I have only just found the limit at circa 550 bhp.
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby John Mc » Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:10 pm

dynamix wrote:Good point Martyn - I made suggestions to Steve a while back on this as to how it could be done in a straightforward way. Not sure whether that is further forward with the vast amount of work the group N stuff is bringing his way though.

A fall back map is a good idea but and it is a big but, a lot of people are using the base map as the std map and having map 2 as the high boost, methanol map. It doesnt leave an option for map 3.

I have no axe to grind on this but am shocked by how many people running Simteks that are not explained as to what they are losing by changing to it from the std very very good ecu that subaru/denso have spent millions developing. I appreciate that it does away with the MAF which can save money on classics and suit a lot of them because the std ecu is non mappable but with the newage ecu, I have only just found the limit at circa 550 bhp.


At the risk of sounding thick reading what you wrote, the standard WR1 ECU is good for up to 550bhp?
John Mc
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harrogate, N.Yorks

Postby dynamix » Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:30 pm

It can be made to be.
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby dynamix » Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:40 pm

I should ad that it is a pain in the arse to do it though :lol:
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby dynamix » Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:15 pm

Can I also add that I have no direct experience of either ECU (yet !) so you should chat to your mapper and get their views as to what it means to you. Also chat to Steve Simpson to get the facts.
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby Martynj » Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:47 pm

Well said Duncan, yes the stock WR1 ecu could be mapped to use a 3 bar map sensor for load input, mapped for antilag and mapped for launch control.
But the fact would remain that it still wouldn't be live mappable, would take longer to tune and wouldn't suit some mappers preferences.
Martynj
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:19 am

Postby dynamix » Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:14 pm

Martynj wrote:Well said Duncan, yes the stock WR1 ecu could be mapped to use a 3 bar map sensor for load input, mapped for antilag and mapped for launch control.
But the fact would remain that it still wouldn't be live mappable, would take longer to tune and wouldn't suit some mappers preferences.


Given the choice I would have happily run Simtek this time last year :lol:

Taking it as far as I have on the std ecu has been interesting as an exercise but a long long journey that is now complete.
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby Chris B » Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:57 am

Motec,or is it just the price that puts people off ??
Heaven can wait....I'm playing with my scooby.
Chris B
 
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Postby Martynj » Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:16 pm

Chris B wrote:Motec,or is it just the price that puts people off ??


The Motec is an excellent bit of kit Chris, but the SimTek can do 90% of what the Motec can at a fraction of the cost.
Take the DBW STi9 we fitted a Motec to recently, by the time we had bought the ecu, the advanced functions upgrade, the DBW control, the cam control and mapped it, it came in at a fraction over £3000 inc vat.
The SimTek equivalent will retail fitted and mapped at half that.
The Solaris equivalent (Which looks as capable, if not more than a Motec) a few hundred more.
Martynj
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:19 am

Postby rocko » Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:26 pm

Well i just getting prices on the Motec as we speak...

Confuessed .com :?
User avatar
rocko
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:43 pm

Postby Martynj » Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:41 pm

It is slightly confusing I agree, you would require the ecu, cam control upgrade, and if you wanted antilag and launch control the advanced functions upgrade.
Don't have a price list to hand but £2000+ mapping sounds about right.
Martynj
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:19 am

Postby dynamix » Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:47 pm

I think datalogging is another cost on top aswell.

It is the daddy but £3k put me off for starters.
Duncan : www.racedynamix.com
email: duncan@racedynamix.com
tel: 07540 185754
Custom Remaps for: All Impreza/Forester 2001-2010 | Classics 92-96 (ESL) | Syvecs (Solaris) | Simtek
User avatar
dynamix
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 am
Location: Cambs or Nurburg

Postby Chris B » Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:47 pm

Just glad I got my Motec fitted 4years ago.
Heaven can wait....I'm playing with my scooby.
Chris B
 
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 1:59 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Return to Tech Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests