WR1 Owners Club

WR 1mpostor (aka number 1 moderator) wrote:Mongy, before you get up your arse and tell me about different types of mapping for different scenrio .......


DON'T BOTHER

PMSL.

Thats the last time i ring you up and warn you i am about to make you look an a$$ hole

So much for being Mr nice guy

Point me to where i have said Mike Woods is talking out his arse then you eejit?

marky mark wrote:Point me to where i have said Mike Woods is talking out his arse then you eejit?

Never said you did numpty

just said group n cars were mapped for early peak

marky mark wrote:Point me to where i eat out his arse

this way

Turbo selection and its spool characteristics are more important to where peak is actually produced.

you can't just 'map' for a low RPM peak, otherwise we would all be running around in cars that produce a peak at 1500 RPM. A 'road' turbo that can flow enough for 350 BHP is just too big to be producing boost that low.

The conversation has been about spread of torque, area under the graph, drop off after peak, driveability etc. This is where the mapper comes a bit more into it (or rather has more control about whats going on)

marky mark wrote:Turbo selection and its spool characteristics are more important to where peak is actually produced.

you can't just 'map' for a low RPM peak, otherwise we would all be running around in cars that produce a peak at 1500 RPM. A 'road' turbo that can flow enough for 350 BHP is just too big to be producing boost that low.

The conversation has been about spread of torque, area under the graph, drop off after peak, driveability etc. This is where the mapper comes a bit more into it (or rather has more control about whats going on)

but i like early boost

marky mark wrote:Turbo selection and its spool characteristics are more important to where peak is actually produced.

you can't just 'map' for a low RPM peak, otherwise we would all be running around in cars that produce a peak at 1500 RPM. A 'road' turbo that can flow enough for 350 BHP is just too big to be producing boost that low.

The conversation has been about spread of torque, area under the graph, drop off after peak, driveability etc. This is where the mapper comes a bit more into it (or rather has more control about whats going on)

I was gonna sa...............

Thanks Mark
As far as i can tell AlanG built it just for road use, so looks like it's been well thought out if the results are anything to go by.

Dunno what he's done since then, but i heard there's another 100 bhp in there.