Page 1 of 2

Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:53 am
by bbigman2000
How do these compare to the WR1's chaps ?

These are from a STANDARD M5 tests carried out at Brunters.

Image

Image

Reading the American forums, there are some better times posted but these seem very fair.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:20 am
by rob500
thought they were limited to 155mph as standard?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:39 am
by 500tie
Its quicker to 60 than mine by just over a second, dont think ill take on an m5 up santa pod. :lol:

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:28 am
by WR1 Bro
I personally like to see 30-70, 50-90 etc... rolling figures can throw some interesting fingures into the mix.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:00 am
by POESY
Not bad compaired to a wr1 tbh.

Rubbish compaired with an FQ400 though :lol: :wink:

Re: Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:18 am
by Bonovox
bbigman2000 wrote:How do these compare to the WR1's chaps ?

These are from a STANDARD M5 tests carried out at Brunters.

Image

Image

Reading the American forums, there are some better times posted but these seem very fair.


Are these figures with a prevailing wind and hoisted mainsail? :lol: :wink:

Re: Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:20 am
by eck
Bonovox wrote:
bbigman2000 wrote:How do these compare to the WR1's chaps ?

These are from a STANDARD M5 tests carried out at Brunters.

Image

Image

Reading the American forums, there are some better times posted but these seem very fair.


Are these figures with a prevailing wind and hoisted mainsail? :lol: :wink:



Nice one dent-boy :D

Re: Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:32 am
by WR1 Bro
eck wrote:Nice one dent-boy :D


How rude :nono:

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:35 am
by bbigman2000
They are only limited in 7th Gear !

They will pull 172mph in 6th.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:40 am
by bbigman2000
WR1 Bro wrote:I personally like to see 30-70, 50-90 etc... rolling figures can throw some interesting fingures into the mix.


There was loads posted on the thread I took these from mate, but I couldnt make sense of them, the yanks are super serious about all that stuff !!

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:49 am
by Megaman
Very impressive figures although they must have been taken on a dry day and thus little wheel spin ;)

Re: Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:19 pm
by eck
WR1 Bro wrote:
eck wrote:Nice one dent-boy :D


How rude :nono:


If you post about a ding expect a cheeky wee comment or two, we have all been there and it's not as if anybody got hurt (although Bono may have sconed her dock when they got home).

Re: Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:37 pm
by Bonovox
eck wrote:
WR1 Bro wrote:
eck wrote:Nice one dent-boy :D


How rude :nono:


If you post about a ding expect a cheeky wee comment or two, we have all been there and it's not as if anybody got hurt (although Bono may have sconed her dock when they got home).


:lol:
I had calmed doon by then, lucky for her, nae worries I dinna mind Dent boy, it's when you call me Rent boy that bothers me :lol:

Re: Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:03 pm
by WR1 Bro
Bonovox wrote:
eck wrote:
WR1 Bro wrote:
eck wrote:Nice one dent-boy :D


How rude :nono:


If you post about a ding expect a cheeky wee comment or two, we have all been there and it's not as if anybody got hurt (although Bono may have sconed her dock when they got home).


:lol:
I had calmed doon by then, lucky for her, nae worries I dinna mind Dent boy, it's when you call me Rent boy that bothers me :lol:


Are you two talking the piss?

Wee - something I do in the garden when pissed?
Sconed her dock - Not evening going to guess!
Doon - sequel to Dune?
Nae - the noise a horse makes?
Dinna - Slang for supper?

Re: Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:14 pm
by Bonovox
WR1 Bro wrote:
Bonovox wrote:
eck wrote:
WR1 Bro wrote:
eck wrote:Nice one dent-boy :D


How rude :nono:


If you post about a ding expect a cheeky wee comment or two, we have all been there and it's not as if anybody got hurt (although Bono may have sconed her dock when they got home).


:lol:
I had calmed doon by then, lucky for her, nae worries I dinna mind Dent boy, it's when you call me Rent boy that bothers me :lol:


Are you two talking the piss?

Wee - something I do in the garden when pissed?
Sconed her dock - Not evening going to guess!
Doon - sequel to Dune?
Nae - the noise a horse makes?
Dinna - Slang for supper?


:lol:
Hints of Doric (our dilect) there. If wi wis ti spik it a i time yi widni cain fit wi were on aboot, fit widni be muckle eese fir a yoo ither feel loons. :wink:

Re: Acceleration Times E60 M5

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:01 pm
by danr55
Bonovox wrote:
WR1 Bro wrote:
Bonovox wrote:
eck wrote:
WR1 Bro wrote:
eck wrote:Nice one dent-boy :D


How rude :nono:


If you post about a ding expect a cheeky wee comment or two, we have all been there and it's not as if anybody got hurt (although Bono may have sconed her dock when they got home).


:lol:
I had calmed doon by then, lucky for her, nae worries I dinna mind Dent boy, it's when you call me Rent boy that bothers me :lol:


Are you two talking the piss?

Wee - something I do in the garden when pissed?
Sconed her dock - Not evening going to guess!
Doon - sequel to Dune?
Nae - the noise a horse makes?
Dinna - Slang for supper?


:lol:
Hints of Doric (our dilect) there. If wi wis ti spik it a i time yi widni cain fit wi were on aboot, fit widni be muckle eese fir a yoo ither feel loons. :wink:


go easy on the txt speak! :rofl:

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:08 pm
by rob500
WR1 Bro wrote:I personally like to see 30-70, 50-90 etc... rolling figures can throw some interesting fingures into the mix.
it supposed to do 60-100 in 5.1 seconds, does seem a slow time for a 500bhp car

PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:06 pm
by bbigman2000
That could be explained by its lack of torque Rob ?

All the power in the V10 is over 6000rpm upto 9000rpm.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:52 am
by rob500
bbigman2000 wrote:That could be explained by its lack of torque Rob ?

All the power in the V10 is over 6000rpm upto 9000rpm.
thanks for the explanation, didnt realise they revved that high, must sound nice 8)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:46 pm
by bbigman2000
This one has an aftermarket exhaust on it bud, but they sound really good standard anyway

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4wxVZGD ... re=related

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:25 pm
by Gee Wr1
Only 4.3 to 60 :oops: Wr1 is 4.2 :P :lol:

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:42 pm
by rob500
Gee Wr1 wrote:Only 4.3 to 60 :oops: Wr1 is 4.2 :P :lol:
where do you get 4.2 from?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:47 pm
by Bonovox
robsti wrote:
Gee Wr1 wrote:Only 4.3 to 60 :oops: Wr1 is 4.2 :P :lol:
where do you get 4.2 from?



http://www.carpages.co.uk/subaru/subaru ... _03_04.asp

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:59 pm
by rob500
Bonovox wrote:
robsti wrote:
Gee Wr1 wrote:Only 4.3 to 60 :oops: Wr1 is 4.2 :P :lol:
where do you get 4.2 from?



http://www.carpages.co.uk/subaru/subaru ... _03_04.asp
you prob already know this but evo mag did 5.3 for wr1 5.2 for stippp, must be a good driver?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:26 pm
by Gee Wr1
Mike Woods from Prodrive was the driver who set the figures. & it has been done by an owner too.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:30 pm
by CAVEMAN
it was the Prodrive guy that did the official time that went on the brochures...he obviously wasn't bothered about dropping the clutch and breaking transmission.

Seems feasible to me though....

Tested my launch thing a few weekends ago, 5.5k build 1.4 bar then side step the clutch. Was pretty grippy tarmac too, so only just got 4 wheels to slip..made for a quick sprint for sure (DCCD on Lock). Don't wanna do that too often just incase.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:37 pm
by John Mc
robsti wrote:
Bonovox wrote:
robsti wrote:
Gee Wr1 wrote:Only 4.3 to 60 :oops: Wr1 is 4.2 :P :lol:
where do you get 4.2 from?



http://www.carpages.co.uk/subaru/subaru ... _03_04.asp
you prob already know this but evo mag did 5.3 for wr1 5.2 for stippp, must be a good driver?


Obviously a typo.... FPMSL, you could do 0-60 in 6th in less than 5.3 in the WR1... The standard WR1 is basically a "factory standard tuned" STi PPP, with better diff controls :lol:

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:48 pm
by rob500
John Mc Tiddler (Dogging Expert) wrote:
robsti wrote:
Bonovox wrote:
robsti wrote:
Gee Wr1 wrote:Only 4.3 to 60 :oops: Wr1 is 4.2 :P :lol:
where do you get 4.2 from?



http://www.carpages.co.uk/subaru/subaru ... _03_04.asp
you prob already know this but evo mag did 5.3 for wr1 5.2 for stippp, must be a good driver?


Obviously a typo.... FPMSL, you could do 0-60 in 6th in less than 5.3 in the WR1... The standard WR1 is basically a "factory standard tuned" STi PPP, with better diff controls :lol:
i know what the wr1 is, i almost bought one but the evo mag put me right off :)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:07 pm
by Bonovox
robsti wrote:
John Mc Tiddler (Dogging Expert) wrote:
robsti wrote:
Bonovox wrote:
robsti wrote:
Gee Wr1 wrote:Only 4.3 to 60 :oops: Wr1 is 4.2 :P :lol:
where do you get 4.2 from?



http://www.carpages.co.uk/subaru/subaru ... _03_04.asp
you prob already know this but evo mag did 5.3 for wr1 5.2 for stippp, must be a good driver?


Obviously a typo.... FPMSL, you could do 0-60 in 6th in less than 5.3 in the WR1... The standard WR1 is basically a "factory standard tuned" STi PPP, with better diff controls :lol:
i know what the wr1 is, i almost bought one but the evo mag put me right off :)


Have you driven one, be interesting to know if you felt it was different?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:16 pm
by rob500
Bonovox wrote:
robsti wrote:
John Mc Tiddler (Dogging Expert) wrote:
robsti wrote:
Bonovox wrote:
robsti wrote:
Gee Wr1 wrote:Only 4.3 to 60 :oops: Wr1 is 4.2 :P :lol:
where do you get 4.2 from?



http://www.carpages.co.uk/subaru/subaru ... _03_04.asp
you prob already know this but evo mag did 5.3 for wr1 5.2 for stippp, must be a good driver?


Obviously a typo.... FPMSL, you could do 0-60 in 6th in less than 5.3 in the WR1... The standard WR1 is basically a "factory standard tuned" STi PPP, with better diff controls :lol:
i know what the wr1 is, i almost bought one but the evo mag put me right off :)


Have you driven one, be interesting to know if you felt it was different?
not driven one but was passenger ride in a very very fast wr1 by a very very fast tuner/driver, it was scarey :D but very nice :)