Login    Register

Drove Mega's ST today

This is the Forum for chat about anything.

Moderators: WR 1mposter, The Swede, Megaman, danr55, WR1 Bro, Moderators

  • Author
    Message

Drove Mega's ST today

Postby John Mc » Sat May 16, 2009 5:31 pm

Went for a blast around some of the finest driving roads in Yorkshire today with Mega in his ST using both the standard map and the 330bhp map (500Nm :shock: )

Pulls like a train in every gear, was a bit damp and was difficult to get the power down in 3rd or below as it kept wheelspinning :shock: It has so much torque low down with the boost starting lower with the remap that you can pull in 3rd up a hill from 1500rpm... I think it would definately beat a standard WR1....

until you get to a corner... :shock: :lol:

Everytime you back off the throttle it cracked a flame out the exhausts which sounded like a mini bomb going off inside the car, sounded awsome.

If this had 4wd it would be perfect but I wouldn't go into corners like I would in the WR1.

Fully expect to be banned after this post :lol: Sorry Bro.
John Mc
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harrogate, N.Yorks

Re: Drove Mega's ST today

Postby Foley » Sat May 16, 2009 6:59 pm

John Mc Tiddler (Dogging Expert) wrote:Went for a blast around some of the finest driving roads in Yorkshire today with Mega in his ST using both the standard map and the 330bhp map (500Nm :shock: )

Pulls like a train in every gear, was a bit damp and was difficult to get the power down in 3rd or below as it kept wheelspinning :shock: It has so much torque low down with the boost starting lower with the remap that you can pull in 3rd up a hill from 1500rpm... I think it would definately get beat by a standard WR1....

Everytime you back off the throttle it cracked a flame out the exhausts which sounded like a mini bomb going off inside the car, sounded awsome.

If this had 4wd it would be perfect but I wouldn't go into corners like I would in the WR1.

Fully expect to be banned after this post :lol: Sorry Bro.


:cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
Focus ST's rule!!!
User avatar
Foley
Moderator
 
Posts: 1517
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:27 pm

Postby John Mc » Sat May 16, 2009 8:00 pm

Like what you did Foley :lol:

Seriously, 330bhp... 500Nm... :shock:

Standard Focus - WR1 would win no doubt.
John Mc
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harrogate, N.Yorks

Postby Foley » Sat May 16, 2009 8:21 pm

John Mc Tiddler (Dogging Expert) wrote:Like what you did Foley :lol:

Seriously, 330bhp... 500Nm... :shock:

Standard Focus - WR1 would win no doubt.


John my last car was a focus RS running 330bhp and use to piss over modded ST'S, Plus the rs could conner as if it was on railes and use to piss all over evo's :shock: Av got rs's running though my blood so if you want to drive a fast ford drive a modded RS :D

The focus st is a good cruiser but defo not for the track,
Focus ST's rule!!!
User avatar
Foley
Moderator
 
Posts: 1517
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:27 pm

Postby John Mc » Sat May 16, 2009 8:32 pm

Now I'm confused... I didn't mention RS's

Are you saying that a tuned Focus ST (330bhp) is faster or slower than a standard WR1?

I would say that the Focus was faster in a straight line.

I would say that the WR1 is better through bends.

Mega drove the ST quickly first to show me what it was like before I drove it... Even he said that he had to back off and slow down before the corner.. when I got in, I had to agree that I felt more confident in the WR1, putting the power on early in bends and also travelling through quicker.
John Mc
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harrogate, N.Yorks

Postby Foley » Sat May 16, 2009 8:36 pm

John Mc Tiddler (Dogging Expert) wrote:Now I'm confused...

Are you saying that a tuned Focus (330bhp) is faster or slower than a standard WR1?

I would say that the Focus was faster in a straight line.

I would say that the WR1 is better through bends.

Mega drove the ST quickly first to show me what it was like before I drove it... Even he said that he had to back off and slow down before the corner.. when I got in, I had to agree that I felt more confident in the WR1, putting the power on early in bends and also travelling through quicker.


A tuned focus RS is quicker than a standard wr1 :shock:
Was giving the wr1 sum stick up the back roads today and found the wr1 a bit tail happy, Gives you some buzz tho driffting round conners :lol:
Focus ST's rule!!!
User avatar
Foley
Moderator
 
Posts: 1517
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:27 pm

Postby John Mc » Sat May 16, 2009 8:42 pm

Fair comment :lol:
John Mc
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harrogate, N.Yorks

Postby Foley » Sat May 16, 2009 9:46 pm

Image
Focus ST's rule!!!
User avatar
Foley
Moderator
 
Posts: 1517
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:27 pm

Postby The Swede » Sat May 16, 2009 9:59 pm

John Mc Tiddler (Dogging Expert) wrote:Now I'm confused... I didn't mention RS's

Are you saying that a tuned Focus ST (330bhp) is faster or slower than a standard WR1?

I would say that the Focus was faster in a straight line.

I would say that the WR1 is better through bends.

Mega drove the ST quickly first to show me what it was like before I drove it... Even he said that he had to back off and slow down before the corner.. when I got in, I had to agree that I felt more confident in the WR1, putting the power on early in bends and also travelling through quicker.



All the same. None of them can match the M5.

Image
Image
User avatar
The Swede
Moderator
 
Posts: 9153
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Azerbaijan

Postby Foley » Sat May 16, 2009 10:13 pm

Image
Focus ST's rule!!!
User avatar
Foley
Moderator
 
Posts: 1517
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:27 pm

Postby Megaman » Sat May 16, 2009 10:23 pm

ROFL - nice to see your thoughts on the car John...

As ive always said in a straight line it is quicker than my WR1 - the wifes proved it by overtaking me on a bypass whilst both flatout... Country roads though youd tame the focus down to 270bhp to reliably get the power down without the torque steer in the wet... still for cornering and putting power down in the wet and dry the WR1 wins hands down in my book thats why the wifes relegated to the ST ;).


As for Foley and the the Focus RS... I had a play with a Graham Goode Racing converted Focus RS which was running around 300BHP. I could keep up with it and slightly edge up to it when my ST was only up to 305BHP on the bypass... but on corners the RS used to leave the ST for dust due to its fancy diff. The RS is also a lot harsher than the ST and as such is built to corner compared to the ST which gets a bit rolly.

Both the ST and RS are good cars and do what they were designed to do for their target audiences. Neither feel anything like a scooby though so for those that havent driven them its hard to explain. :)
User avatar
Megaman
Fords Number 1 Fan
 
Posts: 4206
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:40 pm
Location: Leeds

Postby WR1 Bro » Sat May 16, 2009 11:00 pm

RS Focus and fancy diff... Yawn. It was fancy, but it wasn't clever.
User avatar
WR1 Bro
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20279
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 8:54 am
Location: If skinny, ugly and Scouse was best, then JohnMc would be a porn star legend.

Postby Foley » Sat May 16, 2009 11:47 pm

WR1 Bro wrote:RS Focus and fancy diff... Yawn. It was fancy, but it wasn't clever.


And what the F*ck do you know :lol:
Focus ST's rule!!!
User avatar
Foley
Moderator
 
Posts: 1517
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:27 pm

Postby Megaman » Sat May 16, 2009 11:51 pm

This is where he claims he had one and sold it because he thought it was shite... ;)
User avatar
Megaman
Fords Number 1 Fan
 
Posts: 4206
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:40 pm
Location: Leeds

Postby Foley » Sat May 16, 2009 11:54 pm

Megaman wrote:This is where he claims he had one and sold it because he thought it was shite... ;)


Thought is was shite lol, Ford wrote the book bout fast cars :lol:
Focus ST's rule!!!
User avatar
Foley
Moderator
 
Posts: 1517
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:27 pm

Postby The Swede » Sun May 17, 2009 12:21 am

Megaman wrote:This is where he claims he had one and sold it because he thought it was shite... ;)


He had the old model though.

The question is how the new one is. Having driven the ST and really having enjoyed it, it would not surprise me the RS must be really good.

I'm don't agree entirely that an ST can't match a WR1: those who were at the 2007 Xmas do will remember the orange ST I had that weekend. It was pissing down but still lost every scoob on the back roads around Warwick :lol:
Image
User avatar
The Swede
Moderator
 
Posts: 9153
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Azerbaijan

Postby eck » Sun May 17, 2009 8:31 am

Im totally gutted really thought i had bought the car of my dreams a year ago, should have just got a Fordy :cry: :cry:
The WR1 be safe in the knowledge that, short of strapping yourself to an Acme rocket, there's no quicker way to get from A to B.
User avatar
eck
 
Posts: 515
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Postby Bonovox » Sun May 17, 2009 8:41 am

eck wrote:Im totally gutted really thought i had bought the car of my dreams a year ago, should have just got a Fordy :cry: :cry:


Me too! Wish I had kept my MK4 Escort now :? :wink:
User avatar
Bonovox
 
Posts: 1176
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:41 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Postby John Mc » Sun May 17, 2009 9:28 am

Well if we are all getting sentimental about fords.... I wished I'd kept my 2.0GLX estate instead of swapping it for a petrol mower :lol:
John Mc
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harrogate, N.Yorks

Postby Megaman » Sun May 17, 2009 9:43 am

The Swede wrote:
Megaman wrote:This is where he claims he had one and sold it because he thought it was shite... ;)


He had the old model though.

The question is how the new one is. Having driven the ST and really having enjoyed it, it would not surprise me the RS must be really good.

I'm don't agree entirely that an ST can't match a WR1: those who were at the 2007 Xmas do will remember the orange ST I had that weekend. It was pissing down but still lost every scoob on the back roads around Warwick :lol:


Dude a standard ST is noticeably slower than the WR1, however a remap for £500ish doubles the turbo boost giving it loads more torque all around and can take a standard car from 220bhp up to 270bhp. If you do a few other minor mods like intercooler/induction/exhaust the car turns into a torque machine as John noticed yesterday and even worse a WR1 beater.

:)
User avatar
Megaman
Fords Number 1 Fan
 
Posts: 4206
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:40 pm
Location: Leeds

Postby bbigman2000 » Sun May 17, 2009 4:10 pm

I could waste the lot of you in my old sierra glsi pinto, muppets.
Previously: Everything With 4 Wheels over 300bhp

Currently: M6 (57) & Hilux Invincible (60)
User avatar
bbigman2000
 
Posts: 2069
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:07 am
Location: Elgin

Postby The Swede » Sun May 17, 2009 10:52 pm

Megaman wrote:Dude a standard ST is noticeably slower than the WR1, however a remap for £500ish doubles the turbo boost giving it loads more torque all around and can take a standard car from 220bhp up to 270bhp. If you do a few other minor mods like intercooler/induction/exhaust the car turns into a torque machine as John noticed yesterday and even worse a WR1 beater.

:)


Well, I sure didn't notice at all that the ST was slower than the horde of Impreza's :lol:

As said, I really liked it, even in its standard form Mr.Hertz gave it to me.
Image
User avatar
The Swede
Moderator
 
Posts: 9153
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Azerbaijan

Postby WR1 Bro » Mon May 18, 2009 7:32 am

Megaman wrote:
The Swede wrote:
Megaman wrote:This is where he claims he had one and sold it because he thought it was shite... ;)


He had the old model though.

The question is how the new one is. Having driven the ST and really having enjoyed it, it would not surprise me the RS must be really good.

I'm don't agree entirely that an ST can't match a WR1: those who were at the 2007 Xmas do will remember the orange ST I had that weekend. It was pissing down but still lost every scoob on the back roads around Warwick :lol:


Dude a standard ST is noticeably slower than the WR1, however a remap for £500ish doubles the turbo boost giving it loads more torque all around and can take a standard car from 220bhp up to 270bhp. If you do a few other minor mods like intercooler/induction/exhaust the car turns into a torque machine as John noticed yesterday and even worse a WR1 beater.

:)



PMSL... But with £500 you can modify any car.

How does the drivetrain handle the incoherent ramping of boost? Oooh la la, it works in a straight line on a very dry day. Otherwise, it is a heap of dull Hocus Pocus Focus Smocus shit that tootles to the supermarket to pick up a 4 pack of Tesco's own lager.

You can mod a Micra to out drag a super car... but you still look like a cock behind the wheel.

Clearly John Mc Tiddler (Dogging Expert) Tiddler (Dogging Expert) is easily pleased? I enjoyed my Focus for the first three days as it was something different. After that it was nothing more than a FOCUS dull dull dull. No passion, no sole and no personality.
User avatar
WR1 Bro
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20279
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 8:54 am
Location: If skinny, ugly and Scouse was best, then JohnMc would be a porn star legend.

Postby The Swede » Mon May 18, 2009 8:22 am

Actually, for once I need to disagree with you (on a serious note for once)that a Focus ST would be dull.

The last Focus with its 5 cilinder first of all really sounds brilliant. If you open that exhaust even more up, it will give a scoob witha loud exhaust a run for its money (on sound).

When you drive it, I found that you can feel very much at one with the car and place it exactly where you want it at any speed.

It is obviously true that the lack of 4WD hampers traction in general.

On wet roads, you just compensate when you know the nose will go wide by going into the corner adequately (i.e. turning in early and forcing the car to understeer). When accelerating, you just allow a bit of wheelspin and you search for grip.
You can't just plant your foot down of course and on that same wet road, a scoob or Evo will indeed go much faster as you won't waste any power. But progress will in no way be slow.

I think it's one of these cars that is slower against the clock than some more expensive material, but it can beat them for simple driving pleasure. I'd rather drive an ST on a normal road than a DB9 or an M5 for instance. (which are, I admit, not really the most entertaining cars in their category)
Image
User avatar
The Swede
Moderator
 
Posts: 9153
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Azerbaijan

Postby WR1 Bro » Mon May 18, 2009 8:26 am

Fook me, how can you compare and contrast a Focus to a M5 or Aston? One driver succeeded in life and the other one is more prone to w@nking "badly" watching trains go past.
User avatar
WR1 Bro
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20279
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 8:54 am
Location: If skinny, ugly and Scouse was best, then JohnMc would be a porn star legend.

Postby The Swede » Mon May 18, 2009 8:54 am

WR1 Bro wrote:Fook me, how can you compare and contrast a Focus to a M5 or Aston? One driver succeeded in life and the other one is more prone to w@nking "badly" watching trains go past.


If you think that the DB9 buyer and Focus buyer bought the best they can afford, you're right about their professional succes.

But I tend to not really be interested in the driver, unless she's a 25 year old stunner ;)
Image
User avatar
The Swede
Moderator
 
Posts: 9153
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Azerbaijan

Postby WR1 Bro » Mon May 18, 2009 9:05 am

The Swede wrote:
WR1 Bro wrote:Fook me, how can you compare and contrast a Focus to a M5 or Aston? One driver succeeded in life and the other one is more prone to w@nking "badly" watching trains go past.


If you think that the DB9 buyer and Focus buyer bought the best they can afford, you're right about their professional succes.

But I tend to not really be interested in the driver, unless she's a 25 year old stunner ;)


PMSL... Cars meaning different things to different people. Open your eyes.
User avatar
WR1 Bro
Site Admin
 
Posts: 20279
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 8:54 am
Location: If skinny, ugly and Scouse was best, then JohnMc would be a porn star legend.

Postby The Swede » Mon May 18, 2009 4:59 pm

WR1 Bro wrote:
The Swede wrote:
WR1 Bro wrote:Fook me, how can you compare and contrast a Focus to a M5 or Aston? One driver succeeded in life and the other one is more prone to w@nking "badly" watching trains go past.


If you think that the DB9 buyer and Focus buyer bought the best they can afford, you're right about their professional succes.

But I tend to not really be interested in the driver, unless she's a 25 year old stunner ;)


PMSL... Cars meaning different things to different people. Open your eyes.


Indeed. I was simply referring to the fact that you compared the drivers, I am only interested in the cars.
Image
User avatar
The Swede
Moderator
 
Posts: 9153
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Azerbaijan

Postby bbigman2000 » Mon May 18, 2009 5:47 pm

Swede are you really bumming up a ford with a bloody volvo engine ? You get better every time you post man.

As bro rightly say's us M5 and Aston drivers really dont give a toss at the end of the day, and no matter how you chop and change your views the M5 is still a masterpiece and is still over 70 grand and is maybe outwith your reach financially which may lead you back to some sort of primival jealousy I dont know but its still one of the best car's on the road today.
Previously: Everything With 4 Wheels over 300bhp

Currently: M6 (57) & Hilux Invincible (60)
User avatar
bbigman2000
 
Posts: 2069
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:07 am
Location: Elgin

Postby Megaman » Mon May 18, 2009 9:48 pm

Didnt realise the M5 was that much... theres a lot out there for 70k.... wonder what id go for :?

and dont stop him bigging up the Focus ST as a fun car - if youve never tried one you wont understand.. ;)
User avatar
Megaman
Fords Number 1 Fan
 
Posts: 4206
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:40 pm
Location: Leeds

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron